If you’re this type of answers are distinguished, i compared and that model fitting the information most readily useful utilizing the Design AIC and Model CAIC coefficients to possess non-nested model reviews each models’ complement indices. The initial design had a much better match (Model AIC=; Model CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to the option design (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The difference during the fit along the a few designs suggests the brand new model’s theoretical rationale matches the info ideal (Byrne, 1994).
Discussion
I set-up a structural model to check whether relationships and you may self-confident feel having homosexuals, observed parallels which have peers’ thinking to the homosexuality, and you may religiosity was indeed predictive away from intimate prejudice among an inhabitants away from Puerto Rican teenagers. Our very own conclusions suggest every hidden variables, with the exception of peers’ thinking into homosexuality, forecast participants’ intimate bias for the homosexual folks. When you find yourself early in the day researchers have discovered sexual bias could be high for men than just girls (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we were unable to replicate such overall performance.
Even more search into the potential relationship between intimate bias and social network properties is actually warranted to assess such effects
Exactly how many homosexual persons identified of the people smaller its advertised intimate prejudice toward gay people. That it finding signifies that Puerto Rican youth’s intimate bias are influenced by the deficiency of exposure to gays and you can lesbians. The new stigmatization regarding gay men and women about Puerto Rican community get limitation some students’ exposure to gay men and you may lesbians. Within this populace, getting when you look at the-category boards having gay boys and you will lesbians, such as for example, could possibly get support students’ interactions having gay males and lesbians. Most other scientists have found these types of classroom things disappear particular heterosexual’s negative appraisals toward homosexual boys and you will lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).
Our very own conclusions along with recommend that participants’ confident experiences having homosexual guys and you can lesbians use an affect inside their intimate bias towards the gay some body. Participants’ recall off confident how to delete muddy matches account feel that have homosexual people and you will lesbians is actually strongly predictive of the intimate prejudice. Additionally, the presence of a positive association between participants’ connections that have homosexuals as well as their recollection away from confident experiences with this specific classification implies an iterative procedure which Puerto Rican young people you’ll raise otherwise drop off its purpose to activate with homosexual anyone from the after minutes. These types of findings advise that Puerto Rican younger adults’ appraisals of its experience of gay individuals are especially important inside the framework and you will utilization of facts to reduce sexual prejudice. Products and options generating a breeding ground where anticipate and discover discussion are stabilized get helps confident interchanges. Look on which comprises self-confident experiences between Puerto Rican heterosexual and you may homosexual visitors will become necessary.
When you are participants’ observed similarities having peers’ perceptions for the homosexuality proved in order to end up being non-predictive of intimate prejudice, average relationships ranging from that it predictor and you will participants’ relations and you may positive enjoy which have gay everyone had been receive. Thought of peer parallels have been found so you can mirror respondents’ normative philosophy into the homosexuality and feel predictive out of sexual prejudice (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, when you look at the push). However, we recommend a couple arguments to own as to the reasons intimate prejudice wasn’t predict of the participants’ fellow parallels inside thinking for the homosexuality. Very first, participants within test could possibly get forget friends’ perceptions toward homosexuality and you will make their particular beliefs and you can values about homosexual group. Second, people get socialize for the networking sites where co-workers hold equivalent perceptions towards the gay men.
Religiosity is actually seen to be the best predictor regarding intimate prejudice inside our analyses. Most Puerto Ricans realize certain translation of your Religious customs. Offered Christianity’s stance on homosexuality as a wicked lifetime, this isn’t stunning to get a strong negative connection anywhere between religiosity and you may intimate prejudice (Diaz, 1998; Provider, 1995). Additionally, i expected if or not religiosity you will boost sexual prejudice because of the expanding participants’ moral opposition to interact which have gay somebody and you may/otherwise understand one connections having homosexual visitors since the self-confident. However, an architectural model which have religiosity predicting sexual bias together with the other studies details are discovered to be unreliable and you will unpredictable. For this reason, we do not trust religiosity ‘s the operating basis for everybody other analysis details. While an intervention to lessen individuals’ religiosity was dishonest, i manage recommend discover conversations out of Christianity’s posture towards the sexual positioning rather than homosexual behavior within this spiritual options (Wager, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These types of points can get reduce Puerto Rican’s bad thinking on gay guys and you may lady by detatching the main focus off stigma throughout the homosexual personal to help you a certain sexual decisions.